Japan has long been one of the most iconic destinations for English teachers. With its mix of tradition and modernity, excellent public transport, and strong demand for English education, it attracts thousands of teachers each year. The teaching market is well-structured, offering roles in public schools as ALTs (Assistant Language Teachers), through the government-run JET Program, and in private conversation schools known as eikaiwa.
For many aspiring teachers, the big question is what kind of certification is actually needed. TEFL and TESOL are the qualifications most commonly referenced in job ads and program requirements, but CELTA’s international prestige often leads some to wonder if it is a smarter investment. The reality of Japan’s teaching market makes the answer clearer than you might expect.
The majority of foreign teachers in Japan work in public schools. ALTs, either hired directly or placed through the JET Program, support Japanese teachers of English in classrooms with children and teenagers. These roles focus on speaking practice, cultural exchange, and interactive lessons rather than advanced grammar instruction.
Another major employer is the eikaiwa industry. These private conversation schools run classes after school and on weekends, catering mostly to children and teenagers, though some programs also serve adults looking to improve conversational English.
Opportunities with adults do exist in Japan, especially at universities or in corporate training, but these roles represent a much smaller portion of the overall market. For most teachers, Japan means working with younger learners in schools or eikaiwa.
Job postings in Japan almost always mention “TEFL certification” as the qualification employers expect. This is the standard terminology used by both government programs and private institutions. CELTA may be accepted as a valid certificate, but it is rarely requested outright and is not considered superior to TEFL/TESOL.
In Japan, employers place a strong emphasis on enthusiasm, cultural adaptability, and the ability to manage a classroom of children or teenagers. Professionalism and a willingness to immerse yourself in the local culture often count for more than the prestige of a particular certificate. While certification is required, schools look more closely at personality, teaching style, and communication skills than whether you hold CELTA instead of TEFL/TESOL.
TEFL and TESOL are the clear industry standards for Japan. They are explicitly referenced in ALT and JET Program requirements as well as in eikaiwa job postings. Teachers can complete these certificates online before arrival or choose in-country TEFL programs that sometimes include classroom practice with Japanese students.
This flexibility makes TEFL/TESOL the most practical option. It satisfies employer expectations, prepares teachers for the classroom, and aligns directly with the kinds of roles available in Japan.
CELTA is available in Japan through a small number of accredited centers in cities like Tokyo and Osaka. While it is globally prestigious, CELTA was designed around teaching adults. That focus makes it less relevant for Japan, where the majority of jobs involve children and teenagers in schools or eikaiwa.
Even when employers recognize CELTA, it does not result in higher salaries or preferential hiring. For teachers heading to Japan, CELTA often means investing more time and money without gaining any additional opportunities.
TEFL/TESOL courses are affordable and accessible, typically costing between $300 and $1,500. They meet the expectations of the JET Program, ALT roles, and eikaiwa schools without requiring overinvestment. For those who want a deeper introduction, in-country TEFL programs in Japan sometimes include cultural orientation and job placement support, making the transition smoother.
Because TEFL/TESOL directly matches what Japanese employers expect, it offers the most efficient balance of cost and value.
CELTA costs significantly more—usually between $1,500 and $2,500—and requires a full-time, four-week commitment. Entry is selective, and the workload is demanding. While this level of intensity may benefit teachers planning to build a career elsewhere, it doesn’t bring extra rewards in Japan.
Schools and eikaiwa do not pay CELTA graduates more than those with TEFL/TESOL, nor do they give them special preference in hiring. For Japan, CELTA is simply more investment than the market demands.
One of CELTA’s strongest features is its built-in teaching practicum. Trainees deliver lessons to real students and receive detailed feedback, which is valuable for developing confidence. However, CELTA’s practicum is centered on adult learners. While this may prepare you for teaching corporate English or university students, it doesn’t reflect the reality of most teaching jobs in Japan. ALT positions and eikaiwa schools are overwhelmingly focused on children and teenagers, so the experience CELTA provides is not directly applicable to the classrooms you’re most likely to work in.
In contrast, many in-country TEFL programs in Japan include observed practice with local schools or training centers. This kind of practicum allows trainees to experience the teaching environment they’ll soon be working in—whether it’s large public school classes or the more interactive small-group setting of an eikaiwa. Trainees learn to adapt to Japanese classroom expectations, student behavior, and cultural norms. For new teachers especially, this practical preparation makes the transition much smoother and more relevant than CELTA’s adult-focused training.
The JET Program, ALT positions, and eikaiwa schools all recognize TEFL/TESOL as the standard qualification. Job ads frequently mention it by name, making it the expected credential for most roles. CELTA, while technically valid, is rarely mentioned in Japanese job listings and does not carry extra weight with employers.
What schools value most is a teacher’s ability to adapt culturally, work enthusiastically with young learners, and manage classroom dynamics. A TEFL/TESOL certificate demonstrates training in these areas, while CELTA’s reputation alone doesn’t provide additional leverage in the hiring process.
There are a few niche situations where CELTA could make sense in Japan. Teachers aiming to work in universities, international schools, or the small corporate training sector might benefit from CELTA’s adult-focused approach. Similarly, those who plan to use Japan as a stepping stone before moving to Europe or the Middle East could find CELTA a worthwhile investment for their long-term career.
For most teachers, though, CELTA is unnecessary. It costs more, takes longer, and doesn’t open doors beyond what a TEFL/TESOL certificate already provides in Japan’s mainstream ESL market.
Japan remains one of the most exciting places to teach English, offering structured programs like JET, diverse roles in eikaiwa, and the chance to experience life in a country that blends deep tradition with modern living. But when it comes to certification, the practical choice is clear.
The majority of roles involve children and teenagers, and employers consistently list TEFL/TESOL as the qualification they expect. CELTA, though prestigious worldwide, doesn’t bring extra benefits in Japan. It won’t raise salaries, improve job prospects, or make you a stronger candidate for the most common positions available.
If your goal is to teach in Japan, the best investment is a solid TEFL/TESOL course—ideally one taken in Japan itself, with classroom practice built in. This ensures you’re fully prepared to step into Japanese classrooms with the skills, confidence, and cultural awareness needed to thrive.
👉 Read More:
Helping teachers find jobs they will love.